How many countries does Israel have to attack until they cause WW3? What is it about Israel that gives them a free pass to do whatever they want against any country?
It's pretty simple really, that's we'll never get to see the full Epstein files. They compromise all Western rulers & hold them to ransom. Isn't it obvious by now?
Well, I see no productiv perspectiv in neither sunni nor shia-islamism, but I agree, Israel´s attacking method is not only putting the world at atomic war risk, but is also counter productive for Israel´s survival.
This will likely escalate into a nuclear Armageddon in the Middle East because of the psychotic leadership in Israel and they don’t usually care about the horrific consequences to the people and the nation.
I absolutely don´t support reactionary Islamism. I have always been against its operations - from Afghanistan by the end of the 1970s, when the progressive socialist government with the help of the Soviet Union was on its way to secularization - then Yugoslavia, Libya and Syria, where destructive Islamism was supported by the US, Nato and the Middle East of course. And I see no progressive, secular and liberating perspective in a Palestine led by Hamas. Thus to a certain extent I understand Israel. And no one has ownership of land so in principle, Israel has the same right to exist as the surrounding states. But now attacking Iran under the pretext of self defence is passing the limit, putting the world at further risk of nuclear war - nor can it be in Israel´s long-term survival. Thus the outcome may only be leaving the middle East as an exclusive reactionary islamic zone.
How many countries does Israel have to attack until they cause WW3? What is it about Israel that gives them a free pass to do whatever they want against any country?
It's pretty simple really, that's we'll never get to see the full Epstein files. They compromise all Western rulers & hold them to ransom. Isn't it obvious by now?
Well, I see no productiv perspectiv in neither sunni nor shia-islamism, but I agree, Israel´s attacking method is not only putting the world at atomic war risk, but is also counter productive for Israel´s survival.
This will likely escalate into a nuclear Armageddon in the Middle East because of the psychotic leadership in Israel and they don’t usually care about the horrific consequences to the people and the nation.
I absolutely don´t support reactionary Islamism. I have always been against its operations - from Afghanistan by the end of the 1970s, when the progressive socialist government with the help of the Soviet Union was on its way to secularization - then Yugoslavia, Libya and Syria, where destructive Islamism was supported by the US, Nato and the Middle East of course. And I see no progressive, secular and liberating perspective in a Palestine led by Hamas. Thus to a certain extent I understand Israel. And no one has ownership of land so in principle, Israel has the same right to exist as the surrounding states. But now attacking Iran under the pretext of self defence is passing the limit, putting the world at further risk of nuclear war - nor can it be in Israel´s long-term survival. Thus the outcome may only be leaving the middle East as an exclusive reactionary islamic zone.
And more over, it is completely illogical that Israel apparently supports the Nazi-regime in Kiev.
Thanks for your great work Glenn! We’ve shared the link in our special report.
A Skeptic War Reports
https://askeptic.substack.com/
Another great collaboration between the Judge and Glenn, real journalism.
The subject of using nukes came up.
The original Apartheid state detonated a nuke in 1979 in conjunction with Israhell.
After watching a daily genocide carried out on the Palestinians in concentration camp Gaza, it looks like a certainty to me that they will let rip.
https://kevinhester.live/2025/05/19/the-first-not-last-detonation-of-an-apartheid-nuclear-weapon/