This negotiation process has no value to any party except for the mainstream media in the west that can spin its anti-Russia propaganda narratives and continue to brainwash the masses into WW3 with Russia and China.
“There will be nothing new to report from the eastern front”…like in WW1.
Events on the battlefield seem likely to overtake the negotiations, which appear to have a fairly leisurely timeline.
Possibly a Russian fait accompli might suit the United States better than a long and painful sequence of negotiations that lead to a compromise outcome that nobody will be happy with and for which the new President will wear the blame and responsibility.
It seems like Russia can’t even bury its own soldiers properly.
“Here are the trucks standing there, they brought corpses on it.”
This is one of the numerous mass graves in the so-called “LDNR.” Human hands and shovels are not enough to deal with the burial of “missing persons” on such an industrial scale.
Zelensky and his European clan Ursula, Starmer, Macron, the EU arm of NATO are out of any negotiations, only US and Moscou and even that’s a wrong representation, only neocons, CIA, oligarchs and Warhawks will talk peace with Putin(?)more correct Russian Bears, Steel and their own Warhawks, meaning F.ck you all, war goes on hot or cold who cares.
Perhaps the nomination (or not) of Tulsi Gabbard will be important for this process. Trump has made some off the cuff remarks about the Ukraine war which strongly suggest he is being badly briefed, e.g. Russia has taken 1M casualties. The role she has been put forward for is not to lead the various intelligence agencies it is (as I understand it)to collate their reports and brief the President. Her past record shows her to be a courageous and insightful politician therefore if she gets nominated one may assume Trump will get a realistic picture of the war. Conversely if that role is retained by some DeepState functionary he might be inclined to play hardball with Russia and I can’t see that working. Once bitten, twice shy.
Negotiations with westerners??? Are you insane??? All western politicians olygarches and cultural elite are maniacs perverts psychopats lunatics.
This negotiation process has no value to any party except for the mainstream media in the west that can spin its anti-Russia propaganda narratives and continue to brainwash the masses into WW3 with Russia and China.
“There will be nothing new to report from the eastern front”…like in WW1.
Same shit, new wrapping.
Events on the battlefield seem likely to overtake the negotiations, which appear to have a fairly leisurely timeline.
Possibly a Russian fait accompli might suit the United States better than a long and painful sequence of negotiations that lead to a compromise outcome that nobody will be happy with and for which the new President will wear the blame and responsibility.
It seems like Russia can’t even bury its own soldiers properly.
“Here are the trucks standing there, they brought corpses on it.”
This is one of the numerous mass graves in the so-called “LDNR.” Human hands and shovels are not enough to deal with the burial of “missing persons” on such an industrial scale.
https://www.threads.net/@saintjavelin/post/DFnoTm2upVb?xmt=AQGz7mn4vYRaQXfiWJtoaUkh6c-J_K7xhU532JuIloe45A
Zelensky and his European clan Ursula, Starmer, Macron, the EU arm of NATO are out of any negotiations, only US and Moscou and even that’s a wrong representation, only neocons, CIA, oligarchs and Warhawks will talk peace with Putin(?)more correct Russian Bears, Steel and their own Warhawks, meaning F.ck you all, war goes on hot or cold who cares.
Perhaps the nomination (or not) of Tulsi Gabbard will be important for this process. Trump has made some off the cuff remarks about the Ukraine war which strongly suggest he is being badly briefed, e.g. Russia has taken 1M casualties. The role she has been put forward for is not to lead the various intelligence agencies it is (as I understand it)to collate their reports and brief the President. Her past record shows her to be a courageous and insightful politician therefore if she gets nominated one may assume Trump will get a realistic picture of the war. Conversely if that role is retained by some DeepState functionary he might be inclined to play hardball with Russia and I can’t see that working. Once bitten, twice shy.
Negotiation will be how much face Russia allows the US to save.