Discussion about this post

User's avatar
William Bowles's avatar

It's safer to follow the line of least resistance, especially when throughout your entire life you have been persuaded that your leaders are, if not entirely to be trusted, that it doesn't trouble the conscience, to accept the status quo. It takes a deal of courage to challenge such powerful forces, not to mention knowledge and critical faculties. It's also easier for those of us who have challenged the status quo, to condemn those who haven't. It seems that humility is one of those faculties that's in short supply.

Oscar Alx's avatar

It is my conviction, that the Europeans are still fully beholden to the US. They are now even cheerfully increasing their military spending to 2% and more. I would not be too worried about the soundtrack. Practically all European leaders, including opposition leaders, have been carefully selected by the US, probably by its expression of the "deep state", and accordingly, they have always been highly loyal to Democratic presidents, and vocally critical about Republicans - at least since Reagan.

Scott Ritter expressed, that he thinks it is not unlikely that the US will sort out the issues with Iran with a nuclear bomb, and I agree it would be befitting the flashy style of Trump. And I don't exclude, that Trump never really had a sincere interest in coming to an agreement with Russia; he and his team would not have handled the contacts that stupidly.

Interesting: Germany's Merz has a "distrust" of 70%, even before he starts his chancellorship ( https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/deutschland/innenpolitik/id_100660870/umfrage-union-nur-noch-einen-prozent-vor-der-afd.html ). Par for the course of these western heads of government who have completely divorced themselves from the will of their peoples.

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?