How was diplomacy criminalised as immoral, while war was celebrated as virtuous? Arguments that diplomacy meant “rewarding” Putin and “legitimising” Russian actions supported the objective of isolating Russia. As the Europeans weaponised diplomacy, war became the only solution and peace-building was outsourced to non-European powers.
Discussion about this post
No posts
This phenomenon - hubris syndrome - disorder relating to the possession of power.
Personalities who are convinced of their own excellence can rarely tolerate criticism, let alone admit having made mistakes.
History shows that arrogance has never led to anything but wars, catastrophes, hatred, and enormous numbers of failures.
Glenn, you heretic! You must be silenced lest uncomfortable truths are revealed.
The media are in unison because the U.S. taxpayer funds all of these propaganda networks, while our infrastructures crumble.
Why engage in diplomacy when you can take shots at a bully and then hide behind a bigger bully?